Comments on: C++ Callback Benchmarks http://codeplea.com/cpp-callback-benchmarks Random Thoughts on Programming Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:05:46 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Lewis http://codeplea.com/cpp-callback-benchmarks#comment-12363 Lewis Wed, 31 Aug 2011 15:45:29 +0000 http://codeplea.com/?p=415#comment-12363 I’m using g++ on Windows (MinGW). I just ran your updated benchmark with CPPCallback and had very similar results to what you got.

My primary design goal with PlusCallback was to make something simple and easy to use. Being fast was an accidental side effect of that, so I’m okay if it’s not the fastest.

CPPCallback looks pretty good. If it was around a couple years ago, I might not have made PlusCallback.

]]> By: neo73 http://codeplea.com/cpp-callback-benchmarks#comment-12355 neo73 Wed, 31 Aug 2011 12:10:24 +0000 http://codeplea.com/?p=415#comment-12355 Thanks for sharing this very useful library and benchmark script. I experienced different results using g++ 4.6 and I benchmarked Elbert Mai’s CPPCallback and libsigc++ callback implementations. The results and updated benchmark script can be found at http://www.rooot.net/en/development/code/38-cpp-member-function-pointers-and-delegates.html
What compiler did you used to run your benchmark?

]]> By: Damn3d http://codeplea.com/cpp-callback-benchmarks#comment-4642 Damn3d Sat, 12 Feb 2011 16:31:26 +0000 http://codeplea.com/?p=415#comment-4642 Extremely useful library, IMHO much better than the bloated libsigc++. However it still would be nice to see libsigc++ in your performance comparison ;)

]]> By: bubu http://codeplea.com/cpp-callback-benchmarks#comment-218 bubu Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:19:38 +0000 http://codeplea.com/?p=415#comment-218 Could you add Impossibly Fast C++ Delegates to your benchmark: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cpp/ImpossiblyFastCppDelegate.aspx ?

]]>